That's the thing - I'm not diabetic. I've actually got really good labwork, especially given my BMI. For whatever unlikely reason my body has been quite a trooper in contending with this extra weight thus far other than muscular / arthritic types of conditions. I'm fortunate (mixed blessing!) not to have any cardiac, pulmonary, or diabetic conditions. I have mild sleep apnea, chronic pain conditions; i.e. degenerative arthritis in multiple areas - both knees, hip, etc, fibromyalgia, PCOS, and the beginning of facet compression they keep wanting to give me spinal shots for with no long term solution (beyond weight loss, physical therapy, and a nerve wracking suggestion of a reverse tension treatment to try to slowly slow or reverse the opposite curvature going in my neck).
I somehow keep finding myself in a coverage window whenever I try to improve my health. It wasn't *the DS he said was experimental, he said the SADI-s was - or rather that insurance was still treating it that way. To his credit (or not, depending on which opinion a person holds) he actually said something to the effect of "Which, if I'm honest, I think says something. It's been around for quite some time and still hasn't become popular, although I think that's likely the direction bariatric surgeries are headed in the future". *To be clear, he didn't suggest the SADI-s, he left the choice of surgery up to me and I wasn't feeling confident in the Roux-y and didn't think a basic gastric sleeve would give me the results I was looking for.
I've been reading up on the differences between the DS and other options out there. I can certainly understand why so many of you are pointing me in the direction of the DS, and a specialist for it, at that. I appreciate the candor on this group. You are all phenomenal people, and I am grateful for the information you've all shared thus far!