Diana S.
Well-Known Member
I met with a surgeon at a California Kaiser Bariatric Center on December 1st, 2016. My interactions with him have been very disheartening. I do not believe he is taking my health care seriously, and is ignoring my specific needs to put off my medically necessary health care.
The surgeon conceded that bariatric revision surgery was in fact, medically necessary for me, but he has not taken into consideration my individual situation, specifically that I have already had a Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy procedure performed, and as a result eat very little as it is. I am within the parameters of the pre-op diet already, though I redoubled my efforts to separate types of food and exercise on a daily basis. However, my caloric intake has always been between 1000-1200 calories per day, and so the pre-op diet that's supposed to make me lose weight prior to continuing on to other pre-op testing is a doomed goal I will never be able to achieve. Based on the surgeon's comments, he does not appear to care that I have excruciating co-morbidities that I have to suffer on a daily basis and this procedure is my light at the end of the tunnel to resolve these issues (either partially or totally), however it's being hung up by an unattainable goal that he is unwilling to discuss.
He has also made some incredibly worrying statements regarding the way human anatomy works. He has said several things that demonstrate an enormous lack of knowledge with the way my previous surgery works, the surgery he recommends (RNY) and the surgery I am requesting (DS), and how each of those factors influences weight loss and gain. When I mentioned the Duodenal Switch procedure, and was explaining why I was interested in learning more, the surgeon literally cut me off mid-sentence to say that DS is ONLY for patients with a BMI of over *60* and then proceeded to tell me blown-way-out-of-proportion horror stories about the DS. When I was trying to talk to him about how I am not losing weight on the 1200 calorie diet, because I already eat within those parameters, he said, "If you think you are [not] loosing weight by sticking to 1200 calorie diet and exercise then you will not loose weight with surgery also" which is just plain ignorant. If my VSG was sufficient, I wouldn't be back for the malabsorptive component to the surgery. I am also 11 years out from my VSG, so my body has more than adapted to the reduced intake, which is something he should know inside and out considering he is posing as a bariatric expert for Kaiser Permanente.
Based on my interactions with the surgeon, he either believes that I am a liar based on a very short consultation and some emails, and zero evidence that I have been anything but wholly honest (for indeed it is in my best interest to be honest with my health care providers), he has negative preconceived notions about the demographic of people struggling with their weight, or he's working from a boiler-plate flow chart that lacks any room for personalized care; something that Kaiser Permanente commercials tout very loudly but the surgeon is failing to demonstrate.
Admin note: Edited so that it could stay posted and not give away any surgeon name.
The surgeon conceded that bariatric revision surgery was in fact, medically necessary for me, but he has not taken into consideration my individual situation, specifically that I have already had a Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy procedure performed, and as a result eat very little as it is. I am within the parameters of the pre-op diet already, though I redoubled my efforts to separate types of food and exercise on a daily basis. However, my caloric intake has always been between 1000-1200 calories per day, and so the pre-op diet that's supposed to make me lose weight prior to continuing on to other pre-op testing is a doomed goal I will never be able to achieve. Based on the surgeon's comments, he does not appear to care that I have excruciating co-morbidities that I have to suffer on a daily basis and this procedure is my light at the end of the tunnel to resolve these issues (either partially or totally), however it's being hung up by an unattainable goal that he is unwilling to discuss.
He has also made some incredibly worrying statements regarding the way human anatomy works. He has said several things that demonstrate an enormous lack of knowledge with the way my previous surgery works, the surgery he recommends (RNY) and the surgery I am requesting (DS), and how each of those factors influences weight loss and gain. When I mentioned the Duodenal Switch procedure, and was explaining why I was interested in learning more, the surgeon literally cut me off mid-sentence to say that DS is ONLY for patients with a BMI of over *60* and then proceeded to tell me blown-way-out-of-proportion horror stories about the DS. When I was trying to talk to him about how I am not losing weight on the 1200 calorie diet, because I already eat within those parameters, he said, "If you think you are [not] loosing weight by sticking to 1200 calorie diet and exercise then you will not loose weight with surgery also" which is just plain ignorant. If my VSG was sufficient, I wouldn't be back for the malabsorptive component to the surgery. I am also 11 years out from my VSG, so my body has more than adapted to the reduced intake, which is something he should know inside and out considering he is posing as a bariatric expert for Kaiser Permanente.
Based on my interactions with the surgeon, he either believes that I am a liar based on a very short consultation and some emails, and zero evidence that I have been anything but wholly honest (for indeed it is in my best interest to be honest with my health care providers), he has negative preconceived notions about the demographic of people struggling with their weight, or he's working from a boiler-plate flow chart that lacks any room for personalized care; something that Kaiser Permanente commercials tout very loudly but the surgeon is failing to demonstrate.
Admin note: Edited so that it could stay posted and not give away any surgeon name.
Last edited by a moderator: