Brandy
Freddled gruntbuggly
Seems to say that for normal people lowering carbs is good, but it doesn't matter the exact foods you choose to make up your carb percentage. Anybody want to guess what it means for BPD/DS'ers?
‘Good’ and ‘bad’ carbs? Study raises doubts
Research from the National Institutes of Health indicates that for most people who eat a healthful diet, paying attention to the glycemic index — which discourages eating white bread and potatoes — is not all that important.
By ANAHAD O’CONNOR
The New York Times
Morgan Ione Yeager / The New York Times
A recent study by the National Institutes of Health suggests a diet rich in low glycemic components such as apples, as opposed to bananas, was found not to improve blood-pressure levels.
The idea that all carbohydrates are not created equal has become the foundation of many popular diets. Some argue that foods such as white bread and potatoes, which have a high so-called glycemic index because they spike blood sugar and insulin, should be avoided in favor of more healthful carbs like whole grains and nonstarchy vegetables.
But rigorous new research from the National Institutes of Health suggests that for people who already follow a healthful diet, the glycemic index may not be very important.
The study, published in JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that diets containing low-glycemic foods did not lower cholesterol or other heart-disease risk factors compared with diets containing mostly high-glycemic foods. Nutrition experts argue that low-glycemic diets improve blood-sugar levels and insulin sensitivity. But the new study found that low-glycemic diets actually made insulin sensitivity worse.
“The dogma out there is that a high glycemic index is bad,” said Dr. Robert Eckel, a past president of the American Heart Association and a professor at the University of Colorado, who was not involved in the research. “I hope that ultimately the glycemic index will be left on the shelf.”
Last year, a committee of scientists led by the chair of the Harvard School of Public Health called for glycemic values to be included on food labels and emphasized in dietary guidelines. The committee said it was crucial that the public understand the glycemic response to foods, “given the rapid rise in diabetes and obesity.”
But the evidence from studies has been mixed. The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans encourage people to eat whole grains and “naturally occurring carbohydrates.” The guidelines caution that “strong evidence” shows no relationship between the glycemic index of foods and body weight, even though some studies suggest otherwise.
In the new study, researchers wanted to find out whether diets that were similar in calories and carbohydrates but composed of either high- or low-glycemic foods had different effects on cardiovascular health. So they recruited 163 people, most of them overweight and with high blood pressure, putting them at greater risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes.
The subjects were rotated through four diets for five weeks at a time, with all of their food provided to them. The researchers said they devised each diet to be heart healthy, with plenty of fruits, vegetables, beans, fish, poultry, lean meat and grains. Two of the diets were slightly higher in carbs than what the average American eats, and two were slightly lower.
The researchers then altered the types of carbs. The low-glycemic diets included things such as whole-grain bread and cereal, apples, steel-cut oats, and nonstarchy vegetables. The high-glycemic diets allowed things like white bread, carrot and bran muffins, instant rice and instant oatmeal, and sweet snacks like honey, bananas and apricots in heavy syrup.
When the overall amount of carb intake was lowered, cardiovascular risk factors like cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure moved in the right direction. But when two diets had similar amounts of carbs and calories, the low-glycemic approach did not improve insulin sensitivity, cholesterol or blood-pressure levels.
Dr. Frank Sacks, the lead author of the study and a professor at Harvard Medical School, said that other trials carried out even longer had reached similar results. He said that people should eat whole grains, fresh produce and high-fiber foods because of the nutrients they contain. But except for people who have diabetes and must monitor their blood-sugar levels, those who are already following a healthful diet do not need to worry about the blood-sugar impact of one type of fruit or grain versus another.
“The take-away is a good message for people,” he said. “They can pick foods that are part of a healthy dietary pattern without wondering if they’re high- or low-glycemic. They don’t have to learn that system.”
Dr. David Ludwig, the director of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center at Boston’s Children’s Hospital, said that short-term clinical trials of increased fiber and whole grain intake often fail to show any benefit. But public-health recommendations are based on long-term trials and high-quality observational studies. And unlike very low-carbohydrate diets, which show quick results, low-glycemic diets may require more time, he said.
“A low GI diet may be more like the tortoise than the hare,” he added. “It takes longer but gets you there in the end.”
The developer of the glycemic index, Dr. David Jenkins, a professor of nutrition at the University of Toronto, added that the study was limited because it did not include people with type 2 diabetes, a rapidly growing population that has the most problems with blood-sugar control.
“If they had done that,” he said, “they would have made it easier to see some of the cardiovascular benefits.”
‘Good’ and ‘bad’ carbs? Study raises doubts
Research from the National Institutes of Health indicates that for most people who eat a healthful diet, paying attention to the glycemic index — which discourages eating white bread and potatoes — is not all that important.
By ANAHAD O’CONNOR
The New York Times
Morgan Ione Yeager / The New York Times
A recent study by the National Institutes of Health suggests a diet rich in low glycemic components such as apples, as opposed to bananas, was found not to improve blood-pressure levels.
The idea that all carbohydrates are not created equal has become the foundation of many popular diets. Some argue that foods such as white bread and potatoes, which have a high so-called glycemic index because they spike blood sugar and insulin, should be avoided in favor of more healthful carbs like whole grains and nonstarchy vegetables.
But rigorous new research from the National Institutes of Health suggests that for people who already follow a healthful diet, the glycemic index may not be very important.
The study, published in JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that diets containing low-glycemic foods did not lower cholesterol or other heart-disease risk factors compared with diets containing mostly high-glycemic foods. Nutrition experts argue that low-glycemic diets improve blood-sugar levels and insulin sensitivity. But the new study found that low-glycemic diets actually made insulin sensitivity worse.
“The dogma out there is that a high glycemic index is bad,” said Dr. Robert Eckel, a past president of the American Heart Association and a professor at the University of Colorado, who was not involved in the research. “I hope that ultimately the glycemic index will be left on the shelf.”
Last year, a committee of scientists led by the chair of the Harvard School of Public Health called for glycemic values to be included on food labels and emphasized in dietary guidelines. The committee said it was crucial that the public understand the glycemic response to foods, “given the rapid rise in diabetes and obesity.”
But the evidence from studies has been mixed. The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans encourage people to eat whole grains and “naturally occurring carbohydrates.” The guidelines caution that “strong evidence” shows no relationship between the glycemic index of foods and body weight, even though some studies suggest otherwise.
In the new study, researchers wanted to find out whether diets that were similar in calories and carbohydrates but composed of either high- or low-glycemic foods had different effects on cardiovascular health. So they recruited 163 people, most of them overweight and with high blood pressure, putting them at greater risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes.
The subjects were rotated through four diets for five weeks at a time, with all of their food provided to them. The researchers said they devised each diet to be heart healthy, with plenty of fruits, vegetables, beans, fish, poultry, lean meat and grains. Two of the diets were slightly higher in carbs than what the average American eats, and two were slightly lower.
The researchers then altered the types of carbs. The low-glycemic diets included things such as whole-grain bread and cereal, apples, steel-cut oats, and nonstarchy vegetables. The high-glycemic diets allowed things like white bread, carrot and bran muffins, instant rice and instant oatmeal, and sweet snacks like honey, bananas and apricots in heavy syrup.
When the overall amount of carb intake was lowered, cardiovascular risk factors like cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure moved in the right direction. But when two diets had similar amounts of carbs and calories, the low-glycemic approach did not improve insulin sensitivity, cholesterol or blood-pressure levels.
Dr. Frank Sacks, the lead author of the study and a professor at Harvard Medical School, said that other trials carried out even longer had reached similar results. He said that people should eat whole grains, fresh produce and high-fiber foods because of the nutrients they contain. But except for people who have diabetes and must monitor their blood-sugar levels, those who are already following a healthful diet do not need to worry about the blood-sugar impact of one type of fruit or grain versus another.
“The take-away is a good message for people,” he said. “They can pick foods that are part of a healthy dietary pattern without wondering if they’re high- or low-glycemic. They don’t have to learn that system.”
Dr. David Ludwig, the director of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center at Boston’s Children’s Hospital, said that short-term clinical trials of increased fiber and whole grain intake often fail to show any benefit. But public-health recommendations are based on long-term trials and high-quality observational studies. And unlike very low-carbohydrate diets, which show quick results, low-glycemic diets may require more time, he said.
“A low GI diet may be more like the tortoise than the hare,” he added. “It takes longer but gets you there in the end.”
The developer of the glycemic index, Dr. David Jenkins, a professor of nutrition at the University of Toronto, added that the study was limited because it did not include people with type 2 diabetes, a rapidly growing population that has the most problems with blood-sugar control.
“If they had done that,” he said, “they would have made it easier to see some of the cardiovascular benefits.”
