robs477
Now an Angel in heaven
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 1,227
I know you guys may be growing a little weary of hearing my concerns, but I really don’t have a good feeling about any of this at all and haven’t had for a very LONG time. Call it my "Intuition" a "Gut feeling" lol...so to speak, or just my over engineering analyzations, or maybe just being a big ole milk sob cry baby, whatever....BUT...This may be the proof in the pudding so to speak. And….I’m really NOT too encouraged by what I’m seeing. Experts, PLEASE read this and give me your opinions. I’m trying to interpret the % of CC ratio to AL & BP limbs and it appears to me to not be good. It’s hard to tell from the way this report is written, BUT, it looks to me like the good Doctor just measured 110 cm from “terminal ileum” and then another 140 cm up from that junction to create the AL length???? If I’m interperating this correctly, then there is no flippin way I meet 10/40% ratios of the Hess methods.
As a matter of fact, it appears to me like my numbers are ALMOST just like Scott’s.
This is a direct “Cut & Paste” from one of Scott’s recent posts:
“The second being the Hess Method where the total small bowel length is measured and then the patient is given roughly a 10% of the total SBL CC & then and AL of roughly 40% of total SBL. I was given the former with a CC of 100 CM & AL of 150 CM. My total SBL was not measured.”
Scott was given a CC of 100 CM & AL of 150 CM. As best I can tell, mine was CC of 110 CM & AL of 140 CM, ALMOST EXACTLY the same, total length of 250 CM which IS THE SAME. All that being said, it also appears to me as though there is no total SBL listed as measured in the report, so it may be really difficult or impossible to draw any conclusion based on percentages??? BUT, again, I'm certainly NO expert!
Please see attached report and comment when you can, thxs Rob
As a matter of fact, it appears to me like my numbers are ALMOST just like Scott’s.
This is a direct “Cut & Paste” from one of Scott’s recent posts:
“The second being the Hess Method where the total small bowel length is measured and then the patient is given roughly a 10% of the total SBL CC & then and AL of roughly 40% of total SBL. I was given the former with a CC of 100 CM & AL of 150 CM. My total SBL was not measured.”
Scott was given a CC of 100 CM & AL of 150 CM. As best I can tell, mine was CC of 110 CM & AL of 140 CM, ALMOST EXACTLY the same, total length of 250 CM which IS THE SAME. All that being said, it also appears to me as though there is no total SBL listed as measured in the report, so it may be really difficult or impossible to draw any conclusion based on percentages??? BUT, again, I'm certainly NO expert!
Please see attached report and comment when you can, thxs Rob
Attachments
Last edited: