DS: Only the best should get the best?

DianaCox

Bad Cop
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
6,343
Location
San Jose
When I was in graduate school around 1979, I needed a car, and I fell in lust with owning a little Fiat 125. I didn't have much money (like $1000) and so it had to be an old one, and I finally found one - it was perfect - and the owner refused to sell it to me. He said I couldn't afford to keep it running (FIAT = Fix It Again, Tony), and he couldn't in good conscience, knowing I was living on $525/mo graduate stipend, sell it to me. I was very insulted and butt-hurt about it, but realized he was right. (I got a 1973 Pinto instead - yes, one of the exploding ones - and it was a far more suitable car for me - I even was able to change the carburetor myself!)

But that makes me think that maybe it is our duty, and would be a kindness, that we should all be insultingly and condescendingly harsh to newbies researching the DS as well. Can you afford a DS? Are you smart enough for a DS? Are you emotionally intelligent enough for a DS? Are you mentally stable enough?

It is expensive to have a DS, or at least it is for people who live on a subsistence income. Vitamins, blood tests, high quality protein, protein supplements (for some), bathroom sprays, plastic surgery that you might feel incomplete without, Are you likely to end up unable to afford your costly requirements?

If you aren't smart enough, emotionally as well as intellectually, how are you going to advocate for yourself, over and over, against doctors who treat you like you're stupid or just nuts, for the rest of your life? If you can't do that, you have no business getting a DS.

As we know, there is a pretty high rate of crazy in the MO population. Whether people who are crazy get fat (lack of self-esteem, sexual abuse, or the side effects of the meds), or whether fat people go crazy (e.g., eating disorders, depression), it's pretty much a strong correlation. And the effects of crazy with a DS?? Could be anywhere from ruining your life, your relationships, to fatal - substance abuse, failure to take supplements, needing powerful cocktails they can't maintain, whoring around, going to jail, suicide. Too many game the lame psych evals and end up on the wrong end of the DS stick.

So - I submit you need to have money, smarts, and be emotionally stable before you should be even considered for a DS.

Discuss. :)
 
The difference between the Fiat and the DS? If you didn't get the Fiat, you could get another car. With the DS, other surgeries eventually fail and if your insurance is Medicaid you don't normally get a second chance. So the alternative is a painful premature death, disability due to complications of Type II Diabetes, so many other complications of morbid obesity. I went from being unemployed when I had the DS to now having a career making a lot more money. I'm still batshit crazy but not clinically. I agree that those that have psych co-morbids need complete evaluations. I remember posting (prior to surgery) my concerns about being able to afford my vites after surgery and was jumped on not to have the DS. I'm pretty sure I'd be dead right now if I hadn't had the surgery and I now can afford the vites. I admittedly have an issue with compliance to vites but I have done a LOT better the last few months.

I do think mental illness "may" preclude someone from surgery depending on the severity and support available. Money should not be at issue, IMHO.
 
Wow, really Diana, a ford pinto? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:……I had one of those too, and we’re telling our age:D. That old guy must have been a really awesome dude to put your best interests, a young college girl, over his own desires to sell the car. You would rarely see such a noble and “Fatherly” gesture from someone like that these days. Did you ever wish you could just look him up and thank him, what a cool thing he did?? Great story.

Regarding your topic, it is an absolutely relevant and much needed topic for debate and discussion! VERY thought provoking, and I absolutely agree with you 100%. And SO true, it is NOT suited for the poorest, the mentally challenged or especially the ill informed. I’m a reasonably knowledgeable person and I had NO clue what all was involved with the DS and WLS in general until I decided to go down this road. And that is after studying nutrition, fitness and exercise for over 30 yrs. I am even in a book called “Get Lean” by Lee Labrada (2 X Mr. Olympia, 6 X runner up) and Keith Klein, a world renowned and famous REAL nutritionist published in the mid 90’s and am on page 10, my point being:, as much as I know or thought I knew about the whole subject of nutrition, metabolism and WL in general, when it comes to the DS, I almost had to start all over.

BUT…where I see a REAL problem with this is, as with most good intentions or ideas, is the implementation of those good intentions. Who will get to be “in charge” of deciding your DS fate? The government? We all know what a great job they do on everything! The medical community? We all know how informed they are about the DS? Then who? At present, there is really no government or medical entity capable of doing this???
 
As we know, there is a pretty high rate of crazy in the MO population. Whether people who are crazy get fat (lack of self-esteem, sexual abuse, or the side effects of the meds), or whether fat people go crazy (e.g., eating disorders, depression), it's pretty much a strong correlation.

hmm. well.

I feel strongly about this and yet can't think of anything to say just now. moar coffee!!!!!
 
Well now, there is a middle ground here. In general, and after years here and elsewhere dealing with both MO people and patients with all sorts of bariatric surgery, I do agree that the DS is not appropriate for everyone, but would contend that it IS appropriate for most people who medically qualify for bariatric surgery.

First, the psych issue - yes, if someone is really seriously mentally ill and not going to be compliant, they should not have the DS. However, they also will be noncompliant with any other bariatric surgery. Each operation has requirements. Ever met someone noncompliant with a lap band? I have, and they don't do well! Same for gastric bypass. I suppose VSG would be safest, even if they never lose a pound they just go through life with a smaller stomach, but even with VSG there can be vitamin deficiencies. So my belief is that is someone is that mentally ill, it is not in their best interest to have any bariatric surgery at all.

Money - yes, a certain amount is needed with the DS. But all the operations require protein first, and all require lab work (granted DS requires the most) all require some medical follow-up. And as someone (my new life) already pointed out, being lower income/poor and living with a failed operation that you can't ever get revised helps no one. And the cheapest operation to get - lap band - has not only the highest failure rate, but also requires adjustments to be effective. Do you have any idea what some docs are charging for this??? I've heard numbers like $200 or more per adjustment. A few of those and you're paying as much as the DS lab work would cost. And if your supposedly cheaper to live with operation doesn't resolve your type 2 diabetes, your sleep apnea, etc, you are stuck with the costs of those diseases - meds, CPAP machines, etc. Either that, or you go untreated and end up with severe complications. But if you drop dead of a heart attack from untreated sleep apnea or hypertension, your medical costs drop to zero. Or, when your kidneys fail from your diabetes, you automatically qualify for Medicare, so I guess it's all good.
And plastics - expensive, yes, but optional. Living with the extra skin may not be pretty, and may be emotionally unpleasant for some, but still a huge improvement over living MO or SMO.

Intelligence/knowledge - yes, this is required with the DS. However, the big problem here isn't the DS, it's really the crappy, insufficient, or just plain wrong nutritional info that the doctors supposedly caring for DS patients so often provide. Should people be denied the most effective - for many the ONLY effective - treatment for what I hope we all agree is a significant medical condition because of the flaws of their doctors? That ain't right.
In Marceau's group in Canada, at least when he published his 15 year results, any patient who passed the psych eval got a DS. I lived in Quebec for 4 years. People there are no more or less intelligent, no more or less educated, than the rest of us. They did just fine.

When Diana was denied her Fiat, she had lots of other options. A Pinto (really, what were you thinking, Diana!) was just as effective a form of transportation to get from point A to point B as that Fiat would have been. But gastric bypass, VSG, and esp lap band are NOT as effective at getting people from point A to point B as the DS, whether you are considering pounds or comorbidities. If someone is really nuts, or has a medical contraindication to the DS, or just won't take vitamins (an attitude I don't understand but I acknowledge it does exist) of course they should not have it. But for anyone else, it should be an option, and certainly we are in no position to judge.
 
Funny you should post this now...when I started thinking about the revision I joined several FB pages and all the forums. There's one FB page...it's not a DS page...just a general Bariatric page...I don't think I'm going to be a member of that page for much longer because my ability to keep my mouth shut only goes so far. The ignorance on that page is simply jaw dropping. There are people there still getting the lapband, there are people there who say the RNY is the best thing since sliced bread, there are sleeved people there complaining about dumping, there are people there asking where to find sf jello in a grocery store, there are people there asking how soon after surgery hey can eat rice and bread, and don't even get me started on the people who can't spell or even put together a coherent sentence structure. There are so many people there who post about how depressed they are, how they have no support, no money, no friends, and think if they could just lose weight all their life's problems will be solved.

I have gotten a lot better with age about holding my tongue but sometimes it's just really hard!
 
@Larra, really wonderfully written and a lot of good points

@star2010 re: I have gotten a lot better with age about holding my tongue but sometimes it's just really hard!
Unfortunately, or fortunately, however you want to look at it, with age, I have become just the opposite!...lol
I’m still trying to learn how to not pass up a perfectly good opportunity to say nothing! Guess I’m still a work in progress, and that’s probably why I feel so at home here! :D
 
This post I'm about to write is probably going to make me very unpopular and not make me any friends here. But I am who I am and I feel very strongly about this.

Medicaid. People on Medicaid (taxpayer funded) who are getting WLS paid for. I have a problem with this. If you can't afford to insure yourself or your children, how on earth are you going to be able to afford the protein needs and vitamin/nutrient needs and appropriate follow up care/lab work. And if you CAN afford those things, then you should be able to afford insurance. Same with food stamp recipients. On that FB page I was talking about in my previous post, there was a person crying because they didn't get their food stamps this month due to a glitch in the system or something and were wondering how her family was going to eat. To me, this person is not a good candidate for WLS at this time in her life!

I'm sorry but it grates. I was MO for years....my insurance never covered WLS....it was YEARS before I worked myself up to a place where I could afford to pay out of pocket. I damned sure never expected my state or any type of gov't program to pay for it for me. I'm a BIG BIG believer in personal responsibility. I pay out the ass in taxes, and I pay out the ass for insurance...even with my company paying a portion of my premium, I still pay a significant amount each month. And none of the policies I had to choose from when picking a policy for my company includes Bariatric surgery. So out of pocket I paid again for my revision. And here you have people who can't afford to insure themselves who are getting a free ride. I don't think that's right. I'm not saying they don't deserve to be able to have WLS to be able to have a healthier life, what I'm saying is that it's not their time to have it until they can afford it themselves.

I know there are people who will say...well these people are costing the taxpayers a fortune now with all of their co-morbidities and MO related health issues so it's probably cheaper to go ahead and pay for WLS. I get that but it doesn't sway my opinion.

Go ahead and throw stones at me now....I've got thick skin. I can take it.
 
@star2010 - No stones from over here, I agree with everything you just said and then some. I’m not willing to debate or even discuss that viewpoint or aspect of it because it would lead to discussions about socialism, politics etc, which I hate….so, I’ll just leave it at that.
 
I am in full agreement with Larra here.
to start off, people who have had the surgery or just know a lot about it should be adamant that it is a high risk -high reward scenario. you are, as EN had said on PB, "medicalized for life". i remember the term medicalized scared the shit out of me when I read her post, and it caused me to make a thread asking if people with DS led normal lives at all, however they defined normal, or if they were able to travel and enjoy life etc. etc. lol.

"medicalized for life"


i read that as "the DS is limiting, and you will trade one set of limits of another." now, a year later, i see that it's not that the DS is "limiting" in that it limits your life, but it adds multiple non-negotiable commitments to your life -- vitamins, protein supplementation, yearly lab work for the rest of your life. it's why as a 20 something "lightweight" with so called "pre" diabetes, i was compelled to reconsider the DS given how daunting a commitment it is for the next, hell, 60 years of my life. it's not easy to accept that my multiple weight loss attempts ending in regain have to do with metabolic issues that the DS will best address. i'd much rather believe i have "full control", and can just low carb, diet and exercise an hour and a half 6 days a week to weight loss yet again. thyroid disease, pcos and insulin resistance-- btw- all of which predates weight gain-- will complicate the process for me for the rest of my life. i just have to accept it, and realize that i need surgical intervention, despite the "you are not sick enough or fat enough" for the DS messages i get, including one from within myself. it's not easy. ag

anyway, with the kind of care and financial commitment the ds requires, i think it's very rational to have these fears. it's good to have these, because it means you are not romanticizing the DS because of the weight loss results you see. i have hesitated precisely because i am aware of the life long non negotiable commitments, including one to learning more and more about nutrition, supplementation, the mechanics of the DS and associated complications etc. it's like a life long continuing ed course. it will keep you on your toes.

finances:


i also agree about income, because unless a person is planning on how they intend to change their financial situation, if it's not very stable, then it could turn out to be a poor idea to substitute one set of co-morbidities with serious malnutrition caused by lacking the funds to eat and supplement as you need to. i love what a member above said about their financial situation changing. that gave me a new perspective on this. perhaps, some people actively need the DS to get out of a financial rut because they are disabled or have other constraints due to weight that is holding them from getting the job they want. size discrimination is very rampant, and unless you are a highly qualified professional, it's likely going to hold you back a lot more. fat lawyers are less likely to be discriminated against than fat grocery store clerks. advanced education doesn't make it a level playing field relative to size discrimination, but it does make things easier.

so people have to weigh their own situation, and see where the DS fits in.

now for the "crazy bit"
.

that is an oversimplification, which i am sure Diana is aware of. it really depends on the type of "crazy". not all types of mental health issues are likely to led to noncompliance. i think people who are being treated for mental illness (non-psychotic fmp i'd think), successfully, and are compliant to their treatment and meds in other areas, are really not at any significant disadvantage relative to a neurotypical person. in my own case, while i have struggled with depression, ptsd and ocd, i am highly compliant to the treatment protocol that's been set for me. i am compliant to meds in every situation. i am a hypochondriac and a research fiend. i am deathly afraid of illness, so i am likely to go OTT with ensuring i am okay, rather than neglecting myself. i am, personally, hyperaware of how challenging ds life is going to be. i have never been suicidal. i have faced tremendous adversity, and i know how to make the most of less resources. i know how to take care of myself, and i have been shouldering major responsibilities since i was very young. despite mental illness, i feel intellectually and emotionally equipped to get the ds when i get it. when i decided to delay it, i was working through therapy, and i actively chose not to go through with the ds because i wanted to focus on healing emotionally.
when i do get the DS, it will be when, in my own critical assessment, i'd be ready for it. i am getting to that point, now, slowly and surely. i should also add that mental illness is such a complex and complicated subject, so i am only speaking of my own experiences, and i am in no way casting any judgment upon those who have had a more challenging journey re: mental health problems. whether a person is ready for surgery or not is really such an individual thing.

i'd rather have a smart, committed, rational person who isn't neurotypical but dedicated to their physical and mental well being rather than some vacuous irresponsible "normie" who has no idea what they're getting into.

lastly, i will say that the fiat analogy is a false one.


the DS is often the only choice for people suffering from multiple co-morbs. whether they are currently in optimum shape for it, intellectually, emotionally and financially, or working towards it diligently, another surgery may not be as interchangeable i.e. as conducive to critical long term goals such as weight loss maintenance and co-morb resolution as the DS. for some people, it's really their only and best option. revisions may not get insurance coverage etc.


________________________________________________________________
as a pre-op, who has struggled with some of the issues covered in the op, i would just say the following-

1. rational fear is your friend. you should be worried that you are about to make a decision that is going to seriously impact the rest of your life, and anything less than full commitment to your health and DS requirements is a veritable death sentence. don't replace one with another. mismanaged ds living is as much a death sentence as obesity is.

2. take a good look at your finances. if they are not how you need them to be, come up with a plan to change that. ideally, we should have a desire to change our financial situation and move towards financial stability for general quality of life reasons. the DS only makes it more dire. so, you must be willing to make the necessary changes so that you can accommodate the kind of financial commitment the surgery requires. i, personally, have faced financial setbacks that have caused me to delay the surgery. so, i am not talking out of my ass here or being condescending because i happen to be well off, and have never walked in the shoes of one with major financial constraints.
i know what it's like, and it's why i am working hard to make changes.

career change, in my case:


in fact, the DS is one of the reasons that has changed the course of my career. it's part of what has motivated me to pursue a career in the health sciences. one benefit is that the particular field i am going in to not only interests me but also pays well, and has a market for it that is projected to grow. the field isn't about to get saturated anytime soon. secondly, i have always had to be an advocate for the health of people close to me. i am a hypochondriac, as i said, and i do my best to stay on top of any health issues i have or my loved ones face. so, for me, a degree in the health sciences also provides me with the informational and intellectual tools to be a better advocate for myself post ds. knowledge is power.

do i think a professional degree is a requirement? absolutely not lol. but if i am going for it anyway, i know it will help me not just in a financial sense but also with being more intellectually prepared for the ds and for confronting physicians etc. who have not, historically, taken my concerns seriously, rubbishing them with the assumption that i am just "anxious" or that it's all because i am "fat". i have fought that for the better part of my adult life, but with a degree in the field i have chosen, i am going to be able to fight even more effectively. so, that's a bonus i appreciate.

the career example is just to illustrate that one has to be working towards greater financial stability. perhaps, the ds is the push you need to get there faster. it may be a blessing in disguise, for some. it really depends on your individual circumstances, but it's not impossible to find a silver lining and concretely work with it, if at all you can.


sorry, english isn't my first language, so i can be rather verbose for that reason. but there's my more than 2 cents lol.
 
You would never know that by the way you write! Its another really great post! If you don't mind me asking, what is your first language?
hi rob, thank you:)


@star0210

i won't derail the thread much, and i do agree with the part of your post re: DS would be a poor idea for a person who is barely making a subsistence income. i am a political scientist with a particular interest in political economy, so i could really go on here, but i'll just say this: i believe that healthcare is a fundamental human right. nobody should have to go without a life saving surgery or any kind of critical medical treatment only because they cannot afford it. i am firmly "capitalist" and firmly a social democrat. the two aren't mutually exclusive. i will not debate you on the insurance point or pelt any stones at you. while i am all for people working hard to change their lot in life, and i am intimately acquainted with the constraints and violence of poverty, i also know that endemic poverty is a very difficult cycle to break. it exacerbates weight issues, making it difficult to have access to the kind of nutrition and/or the kind of medical intervention that is conducive to weight loss. and, it it makes doubly harder for fat people, especially fat women, to find gainful employment. economic hardship and upward social mobility or access to health care is categorically never as simple as "hard work" or "personal accountability". this approach can be fallacious on multiple levels. again, i really don't want to spark a political debate here. but, i wanted to provide a relatively brief social and economic justice perspective on that.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top